Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology ; : 153-159, 2004.
Article in Korean | WPRIM | ID: wpr-34266

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Proton pump inhibitors (PPI) and H2-receptor antagonists (H2RA) are commonly prescribed for the treatment of mild to moderate reflux esophagitis (MMRE). There remains great controversy in their usefulness as the first choice and the appropriateness. We prospectively compared the efficacy and safety of the 8-week low-dose PPI vs. standard-dose H2RA in MMRE. METHODS: One hundred patients with MMRE were randomized to receive either low-dose of omeprazole (L-OMP: 10 mg, q.d.) or standard-dose of ranitidine (S-H2RA: 150 mg, b.i.d.) for 8 weeks. The H. pylori status using rapid urease test, histological examination and culture, reflux esophagitis (RE) grading, gastrointestinal symptoms using 4-point scale, adverse event and the standard laboratory examination were assessed at baseline and 8-week end point of therapy. RESULTS: Improvement rate of RE [intention to treat (n=82)/per protocol (n=72)] were shown in 69.1%/63.9% for L-OMP and 65.0%/63.9% for S-H2RA group (p=0.697, p=1.000). Complete healing rates of RE were 54.7%/50.0% for L-OMP and 42.5%/41.7% for S-H2RA. No significant difference in healing rate, the rapidity of symptom resolution, adverse events, and laboratory monitoring was found between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The low-dose omeprazole therapy produced similar healing rates and safety in the treatment of MMRE. In addition, L-OMP is advantageous in its once-a-day dosing and might be an alternative to S-H2RA, especially in Korean patients with MMRE.


Subject(s)
Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Anti-Ulcer Agents/administration & dosage , Comparative Study , English Abstract , Esophagitis, Peptic/drug therapy , Histamine H2 Antagonists/administration & dosage , Omeprazole/administration & dosage , Ranitidine/administration & dosage
2.
Yonsei Medical Journal ; : 577-583, 2000.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-123783

ABSTRACT

Endoscopic mucosal resection with a ligation device (EMR-L) has become important in the curative treatment of precancerous lesions and early gastric cancers (EGCs), but little is known of the long-term efficacy and survival rates of EMR-L compared with surgical resection. We analyzed the therapeutic efficacy and safety of EMR-L in cases of EGC and precancerous lesions and compared the results of EMR-L with those of gastrectomy in patients with EGC over the same periods. EMR-L was performed on 20 EGCs and 54 precancerous lesions including tubular adenomas with or without severe dysplasias in 74 patients. Macroscopic type, size and location of the lesion were determined by endoscope, and the depth of invasion in EGCs was determined by endoscopic ultrasonography and confirmed by pathologic examination of the resected specimens. All the EGC cases were endoscopically followed up for at least 18 months (range, 18-66 months). Patients were selected that underwent subtotal gastrectomy and the survival rates were compared with those that underwent EMR-L. Complete resection was made in a single EMR-L treatment session in 61 cases (82.4%; 91.5%, were precancerous lesions and 65% were EGCs). After a repeat trial of EMR-L, the total rate of complete resection of precancerous lesions and EGCs was 92.6% and 85.0%, respectively. The survival rate of EGCs showed that complete resection by EMR-L resulted in 2 and 5 year survival rates of 100% and 95%, which are comparable to those of surgery (100% and 100%). This study suggests that EMR-L is a technically simple, minimally invasive and highly safe and effective treatment modality for selective EGCs, and offers an alternative to surgical treatment.


Subject(s)
Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Comparative Study , Endoscopy, Digestive System , Gastrectomy , Ligation/instrumentation , Middle Aged , Precancerous Conditions/surgery , Stomach Neoplasms/surgery , Time Factors
3.
Korean Journal of Pathology ; : 794-797, 1997.
Article in Korean | WPRIM | ID: wpr-221075

ABSTRACT

Choriocarcinoma of the gastrointestinal tract is rare. Among them, that of the stomach is the most common. Six cases of choriocarcinoma of the colon were found in the review of the literature. All of these previously reported cases had multiple metastatic foci in the liver, lung, lymph nodes and the prognosis seemed to be very poor. Therefore we think that choriocarcinoma of the colon should be distinguished from conventional adenocarcinoma. A 66-year old female patient, described in this case, was operated on under the impression she was suffering from acute appendicitis. The resected ascending colon revealed extensive hemorrhagic necrosis and perforation with fibrous adhesion in the cecum. On the cut section, the mural tumorous thickening was not definite. Histologically, the tumor showed a focus of typical adenocarcinoma arising from glandular epithelial cells, which were transformed into highly anaplastic tumor cells. There were frequent vascular invasions of tumor cells, similar to syncytiotrophoblasts. In the immunohistochemical stains, both glandular and highly anaplastic tumor cells reacted with cytokeratin. The glandular cells were also reactive for carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and anaplastic tumor cells for human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG). This is the first report of choriocarcinoma of the colon in Korea. We describe this case with a review of the literature.


Subject(s)
Aged , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Adenocarcinoma , Appendicitis , Carcinoembryonic Antigen , Cecum , Choriocarcinoma , Chorion , Colon , Colon, Ascending , Coloring Agents , Epithelial Cells , Gastrointestinal Tract , Keratins , Korea , Liver , Lung , Lymph Nodes , Necrosis , Prognosis , Stomach , Trophoblasts
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL